Showing posts with label Medical School. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Medical School. Show all posts

Saturday, August 01, 2020

07/30/22 Message regarding the SOM Clinical Faculty

Message to Members on Clinical Faculty in the School of Medicine

Charles J. Parrish, President, WSU AAUP-AFT, Local 6075


On July 27th the Union sent a letter to the Administration that demanded to bargain the remarkable change in a personnel policy that had been followed for decades in the School of Medicine. The first concrete steps in implementing this new policy were taken today when letters of termination were sent to all members of our clinical faculty in the School of Medicine.

We understand that the next step will be to offer them a contract renewal that is not based on their present contracts, but will treat them as new hires who will be appointed at a half-time position at a severely lower salary base. The difference in salary is proposed to be made up for the monetary losses involved by the WSUPG, the principal faculty practice plan. This is contrary to past policies and will be destructive to the goals of the School of Medicine.

Further, it will constitute a subsidy to the WSUPG, the principal faculty practice plan. By keeping the appointment at .5 full-time equivalent, the faculty will continue to be covered at the same cost by the University health benefits program so that the WSUPG does not have to offer a similar benefit.

The Schweitzer proposal will not make up the 10% retirement salary match that faculty members presently receive from the University on their higher salary level. The base for the retirement match, given the much lower salary being offered, will also be much lower than it is under the present contract.

The Administration has responded to our letter demanding to bargain the policy changes we cited in our July 27th letter and has agreed to schedule talks with the Union. They also argue that there has been no change in personnel policy and that they have the power to proceed as they are now. We will meet with their bargaining representatives and keep you informed of the negotiations as they progress. We still have two months between now and the September 30th termination date. Let us hope that the Administration will be reasonable and we can come to a satisfactory resolution of this unfortunate situation.

Stay tuned.

Charlie
--
Charles J. Parrish
President, AAUP-AFT, Local 6075, WSU Chapter
Vice President-at-Large, AFT Michigan
President, AAUP Michigan Conference
Member-at-Large, National Council, AAUP
5057 Woodward Avenue, Suite 3301
Detroit, MI 48202
313.577.1750

Monday, July 27, 2020

07/27/20 Demand to Bargain -- School of Medicine Clinical Faculty

Good Morning, Boris:

Attached please find a Demand to Bargain regarding Clinical Faculty in the School of Medicine.

Please contact me regarding this matter.

Sincerely,

Charlie

--

Charles J. ParrishPresident, AAUP-AFT, Local 6075, WSU ChapterVice President-at-Large, AFT MichiganPresident, AAUP Michigan ConferenceMember-at-Large, National Council, AAUP5057 Woodward Avenue, Suite 3301Detroit, MI 48202313.577.1750



Tuesday, June 23, 2020

06/11/20 MEETING WITH DEAN MARK SCHWEITZER

Dear Colleagues:

I had a meeting this morning with Dean Mark Schweitzer. It was a get-to-know you meeting arranged by the previous Dean, Jack Sobel, who also participated in the meeting.

After the usual pleasantries, current issues dominated the conversation. Of these, the one that took up most of the conversation was Dean Schweitzer’s floating of a proposal that all Clinical Faculty members be terminated as of September 30th, and become solely employees of the Wayne State University Physicians Group (WSUPG). They would no longer be regular WSU Faculty members as of that date. Many of these Clinicians have been on the WSU Faculty for decades, almost 50 of them were hired during the 1990’s, and some as far back as the 1970’s. An estimated 250 or so Faculty members would be affected.

I pointed out to Dean Schweitzer how unpopular the proposal was among the Faculty members of the Medical School. Many of the Clinicians felt that they were not being respected despite their many years of service to the University. Dean Schweitzer explained that he was having to deal with many problems, some of which were related to the bankruptcy of the WSUPG. (He had had to announce a cut in the WSUPG salaries by 20, 30 and 50 percent over the next three months in order to address its financial problems.) In this context, and that of the experience of the last several years in which outside consultants had a dominant role in SOM affairs, it should come as no surprise that the Faculty members being affected by the proposal viewed it with a jaundiced eye.

A consideration of many of the Faculty Clinicians also had to do with changes in health and retirement benefits that would come with a change to full employment solely in the WSUPG. Further, where employment as a WSU Faculty member was guaranteed by a term contract of a year or longer, employment contracts in the WSUPG can be terminated with only 60-days’ notice. The contracts also contain non-compete clauses that would prevent a dismissed Clinician from taking another job in the Detroit Metropolitan Area for a significant period of time.

Dean Schweitzer listened carefully and articulated his perspective throughout a reasonable discussion. Former Dean Sobel commented that the new Dean had been appointed in a difficult time, in the midst of a “tsunami.” I agreed with this, but there was no doubt that the Dean’s proposal had a strong, and, perhaps unanticipated, impact throughout the School. Dean Schweitzer recognized this and, without a clear commitment to particular future actions, stated that he appreciated my frank contributions to the discussion. I said that that would always be my approach to communications with him in the future.

The meeting ended with no commitment on the Dean’s part with respect to the controversial proposal. However, he also had not made up his mind on whether or not to go forward with it.

In solidarity,

Charlie

--
Charles J. Parrish
President, AAUP-AFT, Local 6075, WSU Chapter
Vice President-at-Large, AFT Michigan
President, AAUP Michigan Conference
Member-at-Large, National Council, 
AAUP 5057 Woodward Avenue, Suite 3301
Detroit, MI 48202
313.577.1750

Monday, May 18, 2020

05/08/20 Governor Busuito's Response To President Wilson's recent message

Dear Colleagues:

I appreciate President M. Roy Wilson’s thanking me for extending the discussion of issues between Board of Governors’ members and him in his most recent message to the Faculty and Academic Staff. The issues are important to the University. 

The conflict at the top level of the University has contributed to a loss of confidence in the President and the Board among the members of the Faculty and Academic Staff. Only 29% had strong confidence (11%) or confidence (18%) in the President, while 41% had little confidence (20%) or very little confidence (21%) in him with 30% having no opinion. The AAA survey found comparably low levels of confidence in the Board of Governors. (AAA Report, Ques.1f and 1g, pp. 15 and 16) 

The turmoil at the top levels of the University, budget cuts, and questionable leadership decisions have taken their toll on the morale on the Faculty and Academic Staff. When asked how they would assess the morale of the members of their unit or department, the AAA survey found that one-half (50%) said that it was either low (32%) or very low (18%), and only 19% said that it was either high (16%) or very high (3%). (AAA Report, Ques. 9, p. 52) When the survey asked whether or not the members’ morale had improved or gotten worse over the past five years (roughly the term of President Wilson), 54% said that it had gotten either worse (36%) or much worse (18%), while about one-third (32%) said that it was about the same. Those saying that morale had either improved (11%) or very much improved (3%) only totaled 14 %. (AAA Report, Ques. 10, p. 53)

When asked specifically about the contribution of President Wilson’s manager of health and medical affairs to the School of Medicine “Three-quarters of the applicable respondents rate Mr. David Hefner’s contribution to the development of the School of Medicine as negative or very negative. In fact, more than half (53%) rated his contribution as very negative.” (AAA Report, Ques. 6a, p. 46)

The picture that emerges is that leadership of Wayne State University leaves much to be desired in the view of the Faculty and Academic Staff. These survey results will be explored in the future and put into a broader context. But for now, I have been asked to forward Governor Busuito’s response to the President’s recent message to the members of our Bargaining unit. It follows below.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 7, 2020

Dear Professor Parrish,

Please find attached my response to President Wilson’s message sent out to the WSU community on May 6, 2020. I again challenge him on the facts, and his message appears only to distract from, as opposed to clarify, the real issues that I raised at the BOG meeting of May 1, 2020. 

Medical School Tuition

I believe that the vote to approve tuition was based upon incorrect information presented to the BOG during its budget and finance committee meeting on May 1, 2020. They were told that 35% of our medical students leave WSU without debt, and the remainder of students leave with an average debt of only $100 thousand at graduation. Many medical students have indicated that these numbers are erroneous. They tell me that the numbers are closer to 8-10% without debt (meaning 90% plus have debt) with an average of $200 thousand in debt, NOT counting their undergraduate debt. Placing more debt burden on our students at this time when so many people have economic challenges is just wrong; especially when we have another source of funding (PEPPAP dollars) that could be used to protect our students from a tuition raise.

Racial Disparities and Enrollment

I used the Wayne State University Fact Book data for the period of President Wilson’s tenure. My specific concern was a drop in African-American enrollment to WSU by 32% under the tenure of President Wilson.

PEPPAP Funds

PEPPAP are acquired through Medicaid Claims generated by WSU faculty and affiliated groups. This is clinical revenue generated due to WSU faculty providing care to the underserved in the Detroit metropolitan area. This money is intended to reimburse care providers who do not otherwise receive payment from patients or insurance providers. These PEPPAP monies have been diverted to WSU accounts under David Hefner and Rebecca Cooke. These funds are now approximately 80 million dollars and their diversion from the care providers who earned them is currently before the courts. Hoarding this money, if legally diverted as this administration claims, is a disservice to medical school students, the faculty and the university at large. The faculty generated dollars should be retained by the physicians generating the dollars. This was the intent of PEPPAP. This was the point I raised in my letter to you.

Bottom line is that the purpose of PEPPAP is to “increase access to health care by boosting the pay of physicians who work in poor or underserved areas.” How is it not stealing from the physicians when they provide the care and then WSU takes WSUSOM faculty money so that WSU will not “be viewed negatively by the crediting agencies?” WSU takes the money of the physicians and then criticizes them for being a financial burden. This is wrong. WSU is now punishing our front line COVID-19 responders, our physicians, staff and students, by cutting salaries and raising student tuition after taking their generated funds. I say that the handling of the PEPPAP dollars has defeated their purpose of increasing access of health care to the poor. Questions posed to this administration regarding these issues are integral to the future of WSU. This administration chooses to attack BOG members who pose important questions regarding the stockpiling of the PEPPAP funds. In May, 2019, MDHHS reported that “it is not the state’s role to get involved with a dispute between a public entity and one of its subcontractors.” They went on to say that they “would be happy to review the results of any independent audit of Wayne State University’s administration of the PEPPAP program, should they choose to pursue such a formal review.” [source: Crains Detroit Business 4/16/2019 and 5/9/2019] Quit pretending that there is an impending state audit and proceed with a forensic accounting, as none has ever been presented to the Board.

Higher Learning Commission

Michigan’s three largest universities: WSU, MSU & U of M have boards that are elected by the people of Michigan. The purpose of university boards is to provide oversight representing the people of Michigan by sound fiscal policy. Our only employee is the president of the university. Those of us who ask questions about the President’s actions have been attacked by the President and his team. Asking questions of the President is our job. We are elected by the people of Michigan to oversee the use of university monies. To suggest BOG members should “resign for not supporting the President” indicates that there should be no oversight of the President and WSU funds. It is also inconsistent with the State Constitution and the bylaws of the University. This board must not act as a rubber stamp for President Wilson’s initiatives. There must be University oversight for his questionable financial practices. This is not a monarchy. We will continue to ask questions and demand a forensic audit.

Michael J. Busuito, M.D., F.A.C.S.
Member, WSU Board of Governors 
--------------------------------------------------------------
Stay well, stay safe and enjoy the weekend!

Charlie
--
Charles J. Parrish
President, AAUP-AFT, Local 6075, WSU Chapter
Vice President-at-Large, AFT Michigan
President, AAUP Michigan ConferenceMember-at-Large, National Council, AAUP5057 Woodward Avenue, Suite 3301
Detroit, MI 48202
313.577.1750

Friday, April 29, 2016

Wayne State faculty file grievance against School of Medicine

Logos for certain uses involving identification and critical commentary may qualify as fair use under Copyright law of the United States
"In a letter to members, Parrish described several examples of professors who have received job performance letters:"
  • One professor was given a substantial raise for research by his unit's salary committee in each of the past two years.
  • Another has published nearly 20 articles in the last three years. He was granted tenure in 2014 and in 2016 received a letter from the dean.
  • A third professor, when asked the last time he met with his chair to discuss his work, said it was in 2012.

more at Crain's Detroit (google search for full article)

Wednesday, March 16, 2016

04/06/16 General Membership Meeting

Wednesday, April 06, 2016

12:00 pm - 1:30 pm

Student Center Building, Hilberry C

  • How will the Medical School financial crisis affect you?
  • Officer reports
  • Spring Executive Board Officers' election nominations
  • Other membership updates

THIS IS AN IMPORTANT MEETING

PLEASE PLAN TO JOIN US!